Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Bard’OLag's avatar

There’s a difference between accountability and defamation, and you just blurred that line beyond recognition.

Let’s get one thing straight, the LASUSU Vice President was out of line. She was rude, dismissive, and unprofessional in her approach. The quorum saw it, the Speaker saw it, and the suspension was well-earned. No arguments there.

But does that justify the name-calling and reputation assassination? Since when does one suspension equal a complete failure in leadership?

You Can’t Be Judged Twice for the Same Crime

The Vice President was suspended. That’s justice already served. Yet this newsletter is acting like she committed an unforgivable offense, dragging her through another round of judgment in the court of public opinion.

Since when did we start issuing double sentences for a single crime?

If a suspension for misconduct automatically makes someone a bad egg, then I suppose Tobun should be the first in line holding a cracked eggshell.

Because if we’re talking about leadership flaws, let’s talk about them all—not just the ones that fit an agenda.

The Real Job of Journalism

A newsletter is supposed to inform, not incite. To report, not ridicule. To challenge, not condemn.

This? This is just a well-dressed execution order.

If LASUlife really cares about accountability, let’s see this same energy for every failed leader—not just the ones convenient to slander.

Because this isn’t journalism—it’s an agenda wrapped in fancy words.

LASUlife, this isn’t LIFE you’re living.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts