It is interesting on how the publication so to say on LASUSU election was not even detailed enough to cover all aspects, ranging from constitution right as enshrined in the electoral act of LASUSU, or even other faculty where rigging took place in full fledge; you rather choose to project a negative perception about faculty of law election where the process was been rerun in good faith, and the same person emerged.
I keep loosing my confidence in all this student attention seeking press.
My humble advice, you all should rather go and learn your game better so you would do it right.
Not the biased press that choose to report in other to injure the reputation of those who they do not have in their circle, and go silent on this mishap of their shady GODFATHER.
Dear concerned LASUITE, thank you for your 'sincere review'. It is expected that if you have any grievances, they should be registered with the Petition Committee.
Also, it is quite insulting that you find yourself worthy enough to teach a journalist their 'game' which I'd also like to point out that journalism is not and would never be a game.
On a final note, we did not at any point try to paint the LASULAWS IEC or the Faculty of Law electoral process in a negative manner as this report provides a balanced view of both the committee and the people.
Once again; don't get mad, get justice. But you already know that.
I did not come to exchange words; i only shared insight on aspect that was left untouched.
However, it is bemusing that by this time of the election you are still recommending IPC as a means of remedy, it further stresses your understanding on election petition constitutional framework. If you really do, you would know the limitation as to time.
Moreover, the comment on learning your game is apparently a harmless statement which is not to “teach” as claimed; rather to call concerned persons attention to cogent details that have been left untouched.
In your final note, you claim to give a balanced view of “people”, which you couldn’t quote any of them; this raise concern about how intentional your choice of words is in your publication.
At no point did the publication reflect feedback from “people”.
The only report was from the IEC chairperson in person of “OGUNBIYI IBILOLA” as evident in your publication.
Once again, I am strongly urging all PRESS to endeavor to be as objective as ever in their publication, and to consult professional on special areas that is entangled with some level of expertise, or remain silent on such matters which they have no prerequisite knowledge about in other not to mislead the consumers/audience/readers/students populace at large.
The PRESS is suppose to be the voice of the people with no affiliation; so as to manifestly perform their function without fear or favour.
This is not an exchange of words but a rather intelligent conversation, I'd like to believe. Also, it is a relief to know that you are aware of the right processes to express your grievance and you had 72 hours Post-Election to do that.
It is also a relief to understand that your earlier comment was intended to be harmless and yes, LASU Life would do our best to hold people accountable to the best of our ability and we seek help from concerned LASUITES Like yourself to provide any such details to us via lasulife007@gmail.com.
Last but definitely not the least, save for persons who are considered public figures, LASU Life is dedicated to protecting the anonymity of our sources and we will not be PRESSurised into revealing such details.
Thank you once again and we look forward to hearing from you especially with any evidence-backed information sent to our mail.
It is interesting on how the publication so to say on LASUSU election was not even detailed enough to cover all aspects, ranging from constitution right as enshrined in the electoral act of LASUSU, or even other faculty where rigging took place in full fledge; you rather choose to project a negative perception about faculty of law election where the process was been rerun in good faith, and the same person emerged.
I keep loosing my confidence in all this student attention seeking press.
My humble advice, you all should rather go and learn your game better so you would do it right.
Not the biased press that choose to report in other to injure the reputation of those who they do not have in their circle, and go silent on this mishap of their shady GODFATHER.
A sincere review from a concerned LASUITE!
I come in peace. ✅👍☑️
Dear concerned LASUITE, thank you for your 'sincere review'. It is expected that if you have any grievances, they should be registered with the Petition Committee.
Also, it is quite insulting that you find yourself worthy enough to teach a journalist their 'game' which I'd also like to point out that journalism is not and would never be a game.
On a final note, we did not at any point try to paint the LASULAWS IEC or the Faculty of Law electoral process in a negative manner as this report provides a balanced view of both the committee and the people.
Once again; don't get mad, get justice. But you already know that.
Peace be unto you.
I did not come to exchange words; i only shared insight on aspect that was left untouched.
However, it is bemusing that by this time of the election you are still recommending IPC as a means of remedy, it further stresses your understanding on election petition constitutional framework. If you really do, you would know the limitation as to time.
Moreover, the comment on learning your game is apparently a harmless statement which is not to “teach” as claimed; rather to call concerned persons attention to cogent details that have been left untouched.
In your final note, you claim to give a balanced view of “people”, which you couldn’t quote any of them; this raise concern about how intentional your choice of words is in your publication.
At no point did the publication reflect feedback from “people”.
The only report was from the IEC chairperson in person of “OGUNBIYI IBILOLA” as evident in your publication.
Once again, I am strongly urging all PRESS to endeavor to be as objective as ever in their publication, and to consult professional on special areas that is entangled with some level of expertise, or remain silent on such matters which they have no prerequisite knowledge about in other not to mislead the consumers/audience/readers/students populace at large.
The PRESS is suppose to be the voice of the people with no affiliation; so as to manifestly perform their function without fear or favour.
I so submit. 🙏🥰😘
Hi there, once again.
This is not an exchange of words but a rather intelligent conversation, I'd like to believe. Also, it is a relief to know that you are aware of the right processes to express your grievance and you had 72 hours Post-Election to do that.
It is also a relief to understand that your earlier comment was intended to be harmless and yes, LASU Life would do our best to hold people accountable to the best of our ability and we seek help from concerned LASUITES Like yourself to provide any such details to us via lasulife007@gmail.com.
Last but definitely not the least, save for persons who are considered public figures, LASU Life is dedicated to protecting the anonymity of our sources and we will not be PRESSurised into revealing such details.
Thank you once again and we look forward to hearing from you especially with any evidence-backed information sent to our mail.
A press who could not even interview any of the voter, contestant, or observers.
What about clamor on the list of so to say qualified Honorables into the SPC?
I was about to ask if Lasulife has any issues with Lasulaws.
This report does not appear to be objective.